Alternative Asset Management Is Heading Where Mutual Funds Went, and Sagard Is Building for the Specialist End
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
What's New
The alternatives industry will follow the path of the mutual fund business, where beta gets established and the subsequent competition runs on specialisation and focus. Paul Desmarais III, Co Founder, Chairman and CEO of Sagard, argues this in a conversation on Alt Goes Mainstream. His conclusion is that Sagard will not compete on large deals across industries, choosing instead specific sectors, specialised strategies, and smaller companies where a global network changes outcomes. The firm runs a decentralised model in which each pod raises dedicated capital for its own strategy, with no central allocator distributing between them.
Why It Matters
This sits against the consolidation thesis that scale wins because scale supplies deal flow, distribution and brand. Desmarais accepts the brand argument partially, noting that retail adoption favours a single brand because advisor education and trust are easier to build with one, while Sagard still operates Portage, Diagram and its secondaries business separately. His financial positioning is unusual: roughly 10% of assets come from the family and shareholder ecosystem, which makes Sagard its own client and gives the specialisation bet a captive first customer that could equally mask weak external demand.
Big Picture Drivers
Pods with dedicated capital: Each strategy raises its own pools, which Desmarais contrasts with a central capital allocation function, though certain wealth channel products do allocate across pods.
Adjacency as the expansion test: New strategies are chosen for whether they benefit from the existing ecosystem and add to the competitive position, which is how the financial services pillar grew from a venture studio to an early stage fintech fund, a structured equity business and a fintech secondaries operation.
Emerging manager programmes as an access moat: Desmarais argues today's best emerging managers become tomorrow's capacity constrained middle market funds, and writing the first check secures future access to deals alongside them, secondaries and primary capacity.
Physical and financial architecture supporting collaboration: Investment teams sit on one floor with Desmarais reviewing seating to place adjacent businesses together, partners can hold firm equity, and carry is shared across the firm.
Decision authority held at the partner level: Middle market founders want to speak to the person who decides, which Desmarais treats as the reason decentralisation is a commercial feature rather than an organisational preference.
Relationship duration as the acquisition process: Transactions take a year on average, which effectively excludes managers running competitive processes, and the joint vision developed before signing is where misalignments surface.
By The Numbers
$46 billion: Sagard's assets under management, grown from $400 million in seed capital at founding in 2016.
$6.7 billion: Capital from the family and shareholder ecosystem, over 10% of total assets, alongside more than $300 million invested by the team personally.
35 companies: Built from zero, with four of the first eight seed investments reaching unicorn valuations and roughly 3,000 jobs created in Montreal.
More than 10% per year: The wealth growth rate Desmarais argues families need to sustain across generations, which he uses to explain why risk avoidance guarantees eventual failure.
One year: The average duration of a Sagard transaction, and 24 hours the response time Desmarais holds himself to across the platform.
Key Trends to Watch
Segmentation of the industry by deal size and sector: Desmarais expects specialisation to create room for firms complementary to the largest platforms, with value creation concentrated in companies lacking the resources to reach potential alone.
Multi brand operation persisting despite a single brand preference: Sagard states a preference for one brand while retaining Portage, Diagram and its secondaries brand where accumulated brand value justifies it, with the wealth channel pushing toward consolidation.
Lower middle market fund investing as a stated ambition: Desmarais names being the leading lower middle market investor globally as the goal for the fund investing pillar, supported by the emerging manager programme.
Cultural repetition as the mechanism holding decentralisation together: Five stated values, shared carry and equity ownership are the substitutes for centralised control, which becomes testable as the platform adds strategies.
Memorable Quotes
"the more you start shying away from risk, the more actually failure in the long term is guaranteed" Desmarais on why each generation of a family business has to rebuild rather than preserve.
"the most common outcome over a long period of time is zero is a total loss" His reading of company persistence in the S&P 500, and the justification for keeping an innovation arm.
"the beta has been created. Now there's going to be a world where people are going to be seeking alpha and that means specialization" The industry thesis Sagard is structured around.
"everybody remembers the first check they got" Why the emerging manager programme functions as an access strategy rather than a return strategy alone.
The Wrap
The thesis holds if capital allocators begin differentiating between managers on specialisation and demonstrated value creation in smaller companies, giving Sagard's pods pricing power that scale platforms cannot match in those segments. It fails if the wealth channel's preference for recognisable single brands and large diversified products proves strong enough that the multi brand decentralised structure limits distribution regardless of underlying performance. Desmarais operates on a horizon he describes in decades, which makes the near term evidence thin. Whether the emerging manager relationships convert into differentiated access at the point those managers become capacity constrained is the observable test over the next five to 10 years.



Comments